23 Mar RECENT DECISION FROM IP AUSTRALIA IS A LESSON IN PATENT OWNERSHIP FOR AUSTRALIAN UNIVERSITIES
By way of background, under section 36 of the Patents Act 1990, a person may request IP Australia to decide if the listed patent applicant is entitled to be an applicant. In this instance, IP Australia was required to decide whether an Australian university was entitled to be the only applicant.
A recent decision [John Antony v NewSouth Innovations Pty Limited  APO 41] by IP Australia indicates that one of the named inventors, John Antony had been a student at an Australian university when he worked on developing the invention which is the subject of the disputed Australian patent application. However, it was found that at least some of the important inventive work on the patent application had been carried out after John Antony had left the Australian university. On this basis, IP Australia handed down a decision which indicated that the Australian university did not have entitlement from John Antony to be listed as the only applicant and that John Antony was entitled to be listed as a co-applicant.
The present decision indicates that universities or other larger research corporations and their attorneys should be very careful while determining inventorship and changes in employment status of the inventors must be carefully considered. In this instance, some of the co-inventors of the patent application continued to correspond with John Antony even after he had left the Australian university which in turn gave rise to the present situation where John Antony was found to have developed important parts of the invention after his departure from the Australian university.
Entitlement from each inventor to the employer or assignee should be clarified at an early stage before the lodgement of the provisional application and any changes in the employment situation of an inventor during the course of developing the invention must be given due consideration. Where possible, it may also be prudent to get confirmatory assignments executed by inventors to clarify any potential ownership issues.
If you have any questions or queries about patent ownership then feel free to contact one of our Australian patent attorneys at email@example.com.